Skip to main content

The Designated Grammarian

When I was a mere lad, in my early forties,
the American League adopted the designated hitter rule.
They weren't scoring enough runs, and they decided that
pitchers were the worst hitters, so they platooned the pitchers.
For more than a century, pitchers took their turns at bat.
Babe Ruth had been a pitcher:  a whalloping good pitcher!

I have been listening to Bert Blyleven and Dick Bremer,
the Minnesota Twins broadcasters on Fox Sports North,
lamenting the fact that when they play National League teams
in National League parks, the pitchers have to hit. 
It has something to do with getting their asses kicked.

Their logic is that pitchers are fragile, and should not
have to play offense.  I use that term deliberately because
they are using a football argument.  Football players
also used to play both offense and defense, but now
it is rare to see a football player do both. 

Neither Blyleven nor Bremer are arguing that baseball
should double their numbers, and completely divide
offense from defense, but why not?  Football did!
Is it not the case that almost every player is better at one
than at the other?  Even if not, fresh is better than tired.

Any argument for designated hitters for pitchers
is an argument for designated hitters for everyone. 
What is good for the goose is good for the shortstop.

I love the awful decisions National League managers
have to make about whether to take out the pitcher
because right now they need a hit.  Let them sweat!
It makes for a much more complex game. 

Maybe that is why Bert Blyleven does not understand it.

What we really need is for Bert to be admitted, finally,
to the Hall of Fame, so that we do not have to listen to him,
and celebrate his birthday, every day, and wonder how
it is possible never to have learned what an adverb is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...

Best Not Noticed Among Friends

"If I have told you once, I have told you a thousand times:  don't exaggerate!" That isn't what this post is about, except that is has to do with the way we use language, or how language reveals how we think.  What has been intriguing me lately is the growing habit of saying everything twice, or repeating the same idea with different words.  For example:  "When the barrage comes, it comes in bunches."  I rather imagine.  A barrage of one is such a lonely thing, by itself. Here is a list of recent examples: "for each respective team" "both teams have only one timeout, each" "there is this sort of, like. . ." "retweet it out" "but lying about the same, exact. . ." "then elevate up" "He's very good at parceing these arguments apart" "and lied, over and over and over again" And then there are just curiosities: "A man who, everything he touches, turns to g...