Skip to main content

He said/She said

National Public Radio is debating the ethics of "He said/She said" journalism.  Someone called it, "the lowest form of journalism".  

Simply reporting the two, or three, sides of a story to be told, and leaving it at that, might not be irresponsible, but it ought not to be confused with anything other than data gathering--or more likely--opinion gathering.  Gathering the opinions of two experts, or two idiots, and reporting them, might or might not be helpful.   If it gives the impression that the opinions presented are of equal worth, it is probably a disservice.

The discussion of the problem on NPR (of which I heard only a part) was laced with another phrase:  "the truth"; something like, "Should a reporter just report both sides without indicating what the truth is?"  It wasn't quite that clumsy, but that is the argument, in essence.

Sometimes it works that simply.  John says the well is 100 feet deep, and Hank says it is 50.  Maybe it is 100.  Maybe it is 50.  Maybe it is 70.  Maybe it used to be 50, but has been deepened.

More frustrating than the simple-mindedness of "He said/She said" reporting, is the notion that "the truth" is easily available.  Or that objectivity is achievable.

Just the process of choosing what to report, or not to report, is a value judgment.  Whether abortion is right or wrong is a value judgment.  Whether we should cut back on government spending right now, or invest heavily in creating jobs is a value judgment.  There isn't any simple "truth" there!  Trying to escape the irresponsibility of simple-minded "He said/She said" journalism by pretending that there is always a "truth" to be told is also simple-minded.

You can measure the depth of a well.  One can also measure global temperature, but it is not so simple as dropping a weighted line down a hole, and measuring the line afterwards.  "Truth" isn't often so easily gained.  Perhaps most often, truth is what most people agree on.  The earth is a little over 4 billion years old.  The universe is expanding, unless it is contracting, or in stasis.  Politicians often are on the take.  And maybe God is in her heaven.

Maybe the best we can do is throw out what we can show to be false, and live with the best of what is left. And if "false" is too strong, maybe just throw out what is unworkable, or objectionable, or irrelevant.  "The Truth" is too strong a claim.

All opinions are not of equal value.  Some are not worth a bucket of warm . . . spit.  But none of them is the absolute truth, either.  There is no absolute truth:  there is just the best we can do.  And that can be pretty good.

Values are what we hold when we have sifted through.  Most recently.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...

That's all we want: fairness! Not more guns and more war! Fairness!

The five police officers who were killed in Dallas are certainly not the officers who killed innocent citizens. There is more than enough tragedy to go around. "What is happening to our country?", Mari asked this morning. I had no answer.  We do have an answer.  We do not want to say it. There are lots of answers, all of them pertinent. We are a racist society, like most human societies. We are a society in the midst of enormous changes-- social, political, economic--and we do not know what to do about it. We are divided unsustainably into absurdly rich, and an enormous number of crumbling middle class families, and poor. We have guns everywhere; military guns, guns just for killing people, cheap guns, heroes carrying guns into churches and supermarkets, idiots who think guns ought to be allowed in bars and schools and ball games and beauty parlors and political rallies. Our political process is almost useless. There are good people in Congress, but there...