Skip to main content

Who are the Fanatics?

The founders of this nation had not forgotten that many of the original settlers had come here in order to be free to practice whatever religion they pleased.  The notion of an official religion, sponsored, or required, by the government was abhorrent.  So our Constitution states that people in this nation will be free to be religious, as they please, and that government will not deny them that right.  And, second, government itself will not sponsor any of those religions.  

 That, of course, works only fairly well.  Mitt Romney, for instance, belongs to a religious group that once practiced polygamy:  lots of religious groups practice polygamy.  But when Utah wanted to become a State, our government did not hesitate to require that polygamy be denied.  Some of Mitt Romney's ancestors moved to Mexico, in protest.

 The real fact--whatever we say--is that we are a Constitutional Democracy, and that our most important values are embedded in our Constitution, not in any particular denomination or sect.  And if our Constitution and any of our religious groups find themselves in conflict, the Constitution will take precedence.  And the Constitution says that we can pretty much be religious as we please (within the law), and that government will not sponsor any particular faith.  
*   *   *

But it is obvious that every religious group is the kernel of some kind of political system.  Want a king?  The religion will compare God to an ultimate king.  Want a top-down society?  The religion will speak of order and obedience and hierarchy.
Believe men are superior?  The religion will make it plain that God thinks so, too.  Think the man should be the head of the household?  And the nation?  God will be on your side.  

Religions have societal consequences.  There are logical consequences--social consequences--to religious doctrines, and a religious group that become "official" will surely try to impose its logic on the town and the nation.  The Taliban know that.  For centuries, Catholics in Rome tried to shape the Roman Empire in its own image; male and female they tried to shape it (but mostly male).   

There are consequences to being a "Christian" nation, or a "Muslim" nation, and they are not necessarily pretty.  

*   *   *

Nations need not be religiously based.  Ours is not, but the Founders were, for the most part, Europeans, and Europeans were mostly Christian, so the morals and ethics and ideals of the people who wrote the Constitutition reflected common values.  But it is similarly true that completely secular nations often hold similar values.  Everybody has a history, a family, a tradition.  

We talk.  We write, and debate, and noodle.  We come to pretty much similar positions because we talk and write and debate.  

*   *   *

What we need to worry about is the people who have talked to God recently, or maybe even quite a while ago, who think they know just exactly how God thinks about everything.  They are the fanatics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

That's all we want: fairness! Not more guns and more war! Fairness!

The five police officers who were killed in Dallas are certainly not the officers who killed innocent citizens. There is more than enough tragedy to go around. "What is happening to our country?", Mari asked this morning. I had no answer.  We do have an answer.  We do not want to say it. There are lots of answers, all of them pertinent. We are a racist society, like most human societies. We are a society in the midst of enormous changes-- social, political, economic--and we do not know what to do about it. We are divided unsustainably into absurdly rich, and an enormous number of crumbling middle class families, and poor. We have guns everywhere; military guns, guns just for killing people, cheap guns, heroes carrying guns into churches and supermarkets, idiots who think guns ought to be allowed in bars and schools and ball games and beauty parlors and political rallies. Our political process is almost useless. There are good people in Congress, but there...
Post a Comment
Read more