Skip to main content

Ego, Arrogance, and Contempt

Donald Trump is all ego, arrogance, and contempt.  And orange lint-ball hair.  He will never be President.  He will quite likely drop out of the primary contest when he has satisfied the trinity of traits that drive him to pretend that he is serious about running.

We need not, for a moment, worry that he will win the Presidency, or even the Republican nomination.  It is the Republican Party that ought to worry.  Donald Trump is saying out loud what the Republican Party needs to worry about:  racism, Know-Nothing politics, contempt for ordinary people, "Let them eat cake!" attitude toward the poor,  blowhard contempt for other nations and cultures, and such an astonishing ego that one does not know whether to kneel and bow, or to laugh until you wet your pants.

Poll-takers report that 15 or 20 or 160 percent of all prospective Republican voters support Trump.  Let us plainly admit that those polls have very little to do with whether Trump will actually be nominated by the Republican Party, any more than the same kind of early polls suggested that . . . oh . . . Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum would win.  What the polling numbers do indicate is that over on the right wing of the right wing Republican Party, there is an ugly strain of racist, anti-immigrant, hyper-male opinion, and Donald Trump provides an opportunity to hear and cheer for it.

The danger for Republicans, immediately, is two-fold.  If Trump stays in the race long enough, the general public will justifiably identify his despicable opinions with the Grand Old Party itself, and that would cost them dearly in the general election.  In the second place, if the Party "regulars" push Trump aside, and if his ego and contempt is large enough, Trump could stage a third party movement, and take those rabid supporters with him, something as Ross Perot did, and that will torpedo the Republicans, too.   If there is a caveat, it is that Ross Perot really did want to be President, and had ground-level organization.  Trump does not.  Yet.  If ever.

And who knows what either of those scenarios might lead to?  The demise of the current Republican Party?  The need for a new, responsible conservative party, without the racism, sexism, anti-immigrant rhetoric?   If the current Republican Party tries to purge itself of those ultra-right-wing Know-Nothings, what is left of it might not be substantial enough to matter.  It might simply force the formation of a new "Southern-strategy" party.  Who thinks that would be best?  The Civil War has to end some day.

If there is any way in which Donald Trump's ego-bloated campaign might result in something good for either the Republican Party or the nation, I will have to reassess my conviction that there is not a Grand Machiavellian Manipulator playing with history.

Trump is a disgrace.  He represents what is worst about us.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

Nice to Run Into You Again

We do not see things in enormous time-frames.  We human beings are fairly new at figuring things out for ourselves.  For instance, some  people today still think of the earth as a newly created thing, perhaps ten thousand years old.  Earth is actually about four-and-a-half billion years old.   That is to say, the earth is 450,000 times older than the Adam and Eve story, and the universe is three times older than that! I recall first hearing that continents were slowly drifting around the earth, and that there quite likely had been several times when the continents were squeezed together.  But people could stand on the edge of their own continents, and not see Africa or Asia getting closer.  It took at least fifty years to figure things out. We called our continent something special. But sure enough, there have been numerous times during several-billion year history of the earth, when supercontinents formed, and eventually drifted off. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more