Skip to main content

The Tea Party is not just a Republican Problem

The Tea Party people are doing well in elections.
Even when they lose, they do not lose by much.

Democrats are celebrating too early.
The common wisdom is that the far right
has taken over the Republican Party,
and that in the general election,
those idiots will not have a chance.

(I am not disputing the "idiot" part; just the conclusion.)

What fuels the Tea Party is a fear, and a hatred,
of government, taxes, the sad state of the economy,
tied together with thinly disguised fear and animosity
toward Blacks, immigrants, intellectuals, and chablis.

So far, the most vocal of those right-wing
insurrectionists have come from the right-wing
of the Republican Party, so they vote there.
Are we supposed to believe that animosity toward
government, incumbents, taxes, Blacks, immigrants,
and people who hold their wine glasses by the base
are all Republicans?  Are all of the people
who are scared shitless about their own futures
Republican?  Are all of the unemployed Republican?

It may very well happen that in the general election,
a lot of people, thought to be liberal, middle-of-the-road,
sensible voters who might otherwise vote Democratic
are going to put everything else aside, and rebel.

The Democrats had better quit celebrating the mutiliation
of the Republican Party by the Tea Party.  If Democrats
do not present a strong, sensible, appealing, unambiguous
alternative to what has happened to our society
these last few years, the electorate may vote all of them out.

We are dealing with fear, with anger, with a desire
to hurt the people in office who have not done enough.
Neither party has done enough, sometimes because
they are perverse, and sometimes because they are inept.
The Republicans have transferred the wealth of the nation
to the top 2%.  The Democrats have dithered,
and wondered whether they ought to be Republicans.

If the Tea Party resentment is not countered with
a plain, obvious, complete commitment to help
the people who are hurting, the Tea Party will win
enough seats, and enough hangers-on, to turn
the November results into a savage, hurt-them-all-
and-ourselves-too shambles of an election.

This is no time to celebrate Republican problems:
this is a time to propose, and stand plainly, with
an alternative to the religious, racial, ethnic, governmental
anger of people who, right now, do not have
an alternative.  Anger is a destructive issue,
not a winning issue.  A positive program to help
the people who are hurting--and those people
are not holding political office:  those people
do not even understand what the anger is about--
is the only acceptable and honest way to go.

Barack Obama has to lead the way; speaking
plainly, honestly, and persuasively about what to do.
If Democrats will not stop trying to be mainstream
Republicans, let them learn what mainstream
Republicans are learning in the primaries.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Best Not Noticed Among Friends

"If I have told you once, I have told you a thousand times:  don't exaggerate!" That isn't what this post is about, except that is has to do with the way we use language, or how language reveals how we think.  What has been intriguing me lately is the growing habit of saying everything twice, or repeating the same idea with different words.  For example:  "When the barrage comes, it comes in bunches."  I rather imagine.  A barrage of one is such a lonely thing, by itself. Here is a list of recent examples: "for each respective team" "both teams have only one timeout, each" "there is this sort of, like. . ." "retweet it out" "but lying about the same, exact. . ." "then elevate up" "He's very good at parceing these arguments apart" "and lied, over and over and over again" And then there are just curiosities: "A man who, everything he touches, turns to g...
Post a Comment
Read more