Skip to main content

Mitt Romney is a corporation, and should be allowed to vote!

Once upon a sensible time we could tell the difference between people and corporations.  People diddled around and fell in love and married each other and had kids, sometimes.  Corporations diddled around and fell in love with profits and merged with each other and spun off entities.  We were reluctant to give legal identities to gay marriages, but we we happy to give legal identities to corporations.

It was a simpler, happier time.

For a lot of very sensible reasons, we gave corporations legal status:  they could own things, be regulated (sometimes), be sued if they fouled up, and so on.  In order to hold corporations responsible for corporate activity, and to protect people who simply invested in them, but did not control them directly, we said that a corporation was a kind of legal person:  it had an identity, and could itself be held legally responsible.  We did not say it was a person, but that it could be treated as if it were, in some ways.

It was a simpler, sensible time.  People could make distinctions.

In more recent years, the Supreme Court has nudged the legal niceties further.  Toward something baffling.  It said that spending money was a form of free speech.  If you had a lot of money, you had a lot of free speech.  Some people have a lot of money.  Some corporations have even more.

Moreover, for all practical purposes, the Supreme Court has also struck down laws regulating corporate spending in political campaigns.

You put these things together, and you have an election campaign in which the simple, egalitarian idea of "one man (sic), one vote", begins to look like, "corporate money talks loudest, and people vote what they hear about".  Oil money buys an awful lot of TV time.  Rupert Murdock figured out how to control the microphone.

At the Republican debate in Iowa, a couple of days ago, every candidate for the Presidency said that he or she would refuse to agree to a deal to cut spending by ten dollars if it increased taxing the rich by so much as one dollar.  What!


Why?  You don't suppose it is because oil company money, and insurance company money, and Defense contracting money speaks very loud, do you?  Who funds their re-election campaigns?  Who shapes the debate?  Who buys the TV time?  Pays for the plane rides?  It isn't the poor schnook with one vote.  It is the corporation with the loud money.

How long will it be before someone as profound as Mitt Romney, who recently insisted that "corporations are people" will want to give them voting rights, too?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them.  Even when all they wanted to do w

That's all we want: fairness! Not more guns and more war! Fairness!

The five police officers who were killed in Dallas are certainly not the officers who killed innocent citizens. There is more than enough tragedy to go around. "What is happening to our country?", Mari asked this morning. I had no answer.  We do have an answer.  We do not want to say it. There are lots of answers, all of them pertinent. We are a racist society, like most human societies. We are a society in the midst of enormous changes-- social, political, economic--and we do not know what to do about it. We are divided unsustainably into absurdly rich, and an enormous number of crumbling middle class families, and poor. We have guns everywhere; military guns, guns just for killing people, cheap guns, heroes carrying guns into churches and supermarkets, idiots who think guns ought to be allowed in bars and schools and ball games and beauty parlors and political rallies. Our political process is almost useless. There are good people in Congress, but there