Skip to main content

Christopher Hitchens: Somebody

Christopher Hitchens died, as we used to say, "without benefit of clergy".  Cancer does not care whether there be clergy.  Mr. Hitchins did care.  He preferred not.  Decidedly not.  


Like many of us, Mr. Hitchens did not find any evidence for God.  Unlike most of us, Mr. Hitchens articulated that opinion with eloquence and zeal.  


I do not know how Christopher Hitchens preferred to describe himself, but the news media are littered with terms like, "atheist", "non-believer", and "non-religious".  He is a "non".  They might just as well say that he was a non-Catholic, or a non-Buddhist, or a non-Seventh Day Adventist.  It is a way of description that assumes that to be a real something, or a real somebody, you have to be a Catholic, or a Buddhist, or a Seventh Day Adventist.  If you aren't one of those (or a Lutheran or a Baptist or a Cargo Cultist), you have no real identity:  you are "non".  


Personally, I am not an atheist:  an atheist is someone whose identity is described as an opposition to the notion that God is a person.  Similarly, if you are amoral, you are not moral, or without morals.  I am not sure that is very easily done.  I am not a religious believer, but neither is my identity to be defined as being in opposition to something.  I am for things!  For knowing as much as we can.  For being rational.  For using our brains.  For learning how things really work.  For finding a cure for the kind of cancer that killed Christopher Hitchens.  For being a good and decent and kind person.  


It is almost impossible to defend the notion that religious people have better morals than people who find the existence of gods to be leftover myths.  Some religious people are wonderful people and some are awful, in just the same way that most human beings are.  It is often asserted, without convincing contradiction, that our most horrible wars have been for the sake of religious convictions.  And some have been started by savage psychopaths.  The wars look pretty much the same, and have the same results.  


I have already lived eighteen more years than Christopher Hitchens did, and I can only envy how much he accomplished in his sixty-two years.  He was not a model human being.  "Irracible" might be too mild a description of him.  He left a very large mark.  He was not an a-anything; a non-anything.  He was really something!  Really somebody!  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

Nice to Run Into You Again

We do not see things in enormous time-frames.  We human beings are fairly new at figuring things out for ourselves.  For instance, some  people today still think of the earth as a newly created thing, perhaps ten thousand years old.  Earth is actually about four-and-a-half billion years old.   That is to say, the earth is 450,000 times older than the Adam and Eve story, and the universe is three times older than that! I recall first hearing that continents were slowly drifting around the earth, and that there quite likely had been several times when the continents were squeezed together.  But people could stand on the edge of their own continents, and not see Africa or Asia getting closer.  It took at least fifty years to figure things out. We called our continent something special. But sure enough, there have been numerous times during several-billion year history of the earth, when supercontinents formed, and eventually drifted off. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more