Skip to main content

No, it is not the same!

David Brooks, a columnist of considerable repute,
wrote a column in which he compared the student uprising
of the 1960s to that of the Tea Baggers at the present time.

The column amazed me! 

I was already of middle age during the 1960s,
and I recall that, with a few exceptions, mostly from academia,
the people who raised hell were young.  They hated war.
They were angry that universities were cooperating
with the military to conduct war, and to draft young people
to fight the wars the young thought were insane. 

The movement quickly merged with the struggle against racism.
The movement found synonyms for the terms used in the French
Revolution:  liberty, equality, fraternity; nobody refused to eat
French Fries.  Muhammad Ali refused to go to war. 

The guns were all on the other side.  Lots of guns.

Because conventional Americans defended the war,
and the government that conducted the war, young people
in the 1960s rebelled against lots of things conventional:
sexual mores, racist attitudes, dress codes, and any conventional
authority that tried to defend what had gotten us into that fix.

Today, Tea Party participants look like the parents and
grandparents of what they still call "hippies".  People
bring guns to Tea Party gatherings.  They don't sing
Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger and Joan Baez songs:  they curse
and shout "Fuck you!" to the people they scorn.

Tea Party gatherings are embarrassingly white, and most
of them look as if they are almost as old as I am now.

Nobody would describe the protesters of the sixties
as in a rage.  They were angry about war and repression
and injustice, but they were not carrying guns and screaming.

I tried to get into Main Building and my office
when students had closed down the college.
"I'm sorry, Conrad," one of the students said.
"This isn't personal.  You can't go in there."

Nobody threatened me.  Nobody shouted at me.

The only angry shouting I heard was done by a Chemistry prof.
He wanted to get a bolt cutter and storm the building.
His office wasn't even in the building. 

He was born fifty years before his time. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard

Nice to Run Into You Again

We do not see things in enormous time-frames.  We human beings are fairly new at figuring things out for ourselves.  For instance, some  people today still think of the earth as a newly created thing, perhaps ten thousand years old.  Earth is actually about four-and-a-half billion years old.   That is to say, the earth is 450,000 times older than the Adam and Eve story, and the universe is three times older than that! I recall first hearing that continents were slowly drifting around the earth, and that there quite likely had been several times when the continents were squeezed together.  But people could stand on the edge of their own continents, and not see Africa or Asia getting closer.  It took at least fifty years to figure things out. We called our continent something special. But sure enough, there have been numerous times during several-billion year history of the earth, when supercontinents formed, and eventually drifted off. ...

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...