Skip to main content

Tim Tebow for President!

Stan sent the message that God had posted somewhere, after the New England Patriots almost humiliated Tim Tebow and the Denver Broncos:  "Tim Tebow is completely on his own", although Ben says that God either does not like football, or maybe just isn't good at it.


At the same time, a battalion of right-wing preachers gathered on a ranch just south of God, and announced that they were swinging their supporters at Rick Santorum in their fight against godless communism and godly Mormons.  So we know, in a secondhand way, that God likes politics more than he likes football, and that is troubling.

I should not be so hasty.   The primary in South Carolina is nearly a week away, and the Evangelical Republican support for anyone but Mitt and Newt might not work any better than Tim Tebow's long-armed passing attack.  And if swinging God to the side of Rick Santorum does not work, I suppose we will need to wonder what does work in football and in politics.  The whole Texas tradition of holding your nose and praying for the high school football and gubernatorial teams may have to be reconsidered.

The Other Rick--Parry--who, in a debate, said he wanted to eliminate three cabinet-level positions, but could not remember which three they were, said the same thing again in South Carolina, and this time he substituted the Department of the Interior for one of them.  Rick is showing his flexibility.  Although it is a little like arguing that our laws on based on Moses' Nine Commandments.  Or Eight.

God, you know, actually urged Michele Bachmann to run for the Evangelical Republican nomination for the Presidency, but she was outpaced by just about everybody else, which suggests that God may have a good eye for politics, but be a bad judge of track and field talent.

After seeing how the Patriots took Denver apart, even when Denver clearly had the more godly quarterback, I earnestly hope that the choice of Rick Santorum by the Right Religious Folk works.  It would be hell to have to pick presidents for their political opinions and records.   Well, which cabinet level departments do you think ought to be eliminated?   The House or Senate?  The Vice Presidency?  Texas?

See!  We need divine guidance!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...

Best Not Noticed Among Friends

"If I have told you once, I have told you a thousand times:  don't exaggerate!" That isn't what this post is about, except that is has to do with the way we use language, or how language reveals how we think.  What has been intriguing me lately is the growing habit of saying everything twice, or repeating the same idea with different words.  For example:  "When the barrage comes, it comes in bunches."  I rather imagine.  A barrage of one is such a lonely thing, by itself. Here is a list of recent examples: "for each respective team" "both teams have only one timeout, each" "there is this sort of, like. . ." "retweet it out" "but lying about the same, exact. . ." "then elevate up" "He's very good at parceing these arguments apart" "and lied, over and over and over again" And then there are just curiosities: "A man who, everything he touches, turns to g...