Skip to main content

The Dilemma of Mixed Motives, and Human Decency

Sometimes it is all about the oil.
When the oil companies are in charge, it is all about the oil.
Sometimes it is coal, or canals, or tulips, or gold.
Whenever the business people are in charge, it is all about money.  


When we invaded Iraq, it was all about the oil.  


Saddam Hussein had once been a ferocious tiger, 
perfectly willing to kill Iraqis or Iranians, Kurds,
soccer players, or his own relatives.  But when we invaded,
it was not because Hussein was a monstrous threat to humanity:
he was contained, snarling, bluffing, blowing air, pretending
to be what he had once been:  a monster.  When we invaded,
it was because Iraq had oil!  Lots of oil!  Oil we need!


We pretended Iraq was about humanity, about savagery,
about chemical warfare, and nuclear (in)capability.  
George Bush and his business friends thought it was possible
to establish a democracy right in the middle of mid-eastern oil
that would be a light unto the nations, and sell us oil. 


We didn't invade Rwanda.  We waited.  Kosovo?  We waited.
The monsters who were killing each other in Africa and
Eastern Europe were as savage as Saddam had been,
but they had no oil.  We let them go too long.  We shared
in their savagery by waiting too long.  Some of you
have been in the churches lined with the skulls of the dead.


Sometimes it is both oil and human savagery that we see.
In Libya, it is both.  Muammar Gaddafi is no less a monster
than Saddam Hussein was.  If we did not know that at first, 
we soon learned.  Most of Libya's oil goes to Europe because
their refineries are designed to refine that kind of oil.  
We are prepared here to refine more sulpher than they.  


So we tolerated Gaddafi.  Europe tolerated Gaddafi.  
Oil money made it easier to see that Gaddafi's savagery
was Libya's problem.  Our problem was oil.  It is not, we said,
our problem to deal with Colonel Gaddafi, the savage.


So the Libyans did.  After Sudan, after Egypt, Libyans
said it was time for Gaddafi to go, and they rebelled.  
They had good reasons, and at first it went well, but Gaddafi
had both sweet oil and savage guns, and he started the killing.


We, here in the United States, have been caught between
our lust for oil--not so much Libya's oil--and our shame 
and anger at the savagery of Kosovo and Rwanda and Gaddafi.
We don't have to pretend to be pure and unstained: we own
both lust and shame, but whether our motives have been mixed,
both before and about Libya, we are, at least, aware 
of our own mixed morality and motives:  both oil and decency.


I hope we can keep it mostly about decency, and drive Gaddafi
out of Libya, and then leave, ourselves.  Libya will be a mess.
It should be Libya's mess.  Let them find for themselves 
what they want to be; what they want to do with their oil
and their humanity.  I hope we do not stay too long in their space;
their air space, or their hopes.  I hope they do well.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

That's all we want: fairness! Not more guns and more war! Fairness!

The five police officers who were killed in Dallas are certainly not the officers who killed innocent citizens. There is more than enough tragedy to go around. "What is happening to our country?", Mari asked this morning. I had no answer.  We do have an answer.  We do not want to say it. There are lots of answers, all of them pertinent. We are a racist society, like most human societies. We are a society in the midst of enormous changes-- social, political, economic--and we do not know what to do about it. We are divided unsustainably into absurdly rich, and an enormous number of crumbling middle class families, and poor. We have guns everywhere; military guns, guns just for killing people, cheap guns, heroes carrying guns into churches and supermarkets, idiots who think guns ought to be allowed in bars and schools and ball games and beauty parlors and political rallies. Our political process is almost useless. There are good people in Congress, but there...
Post a Comment
Read more