Skip to main content

Logic, Marriage, and Heavy Water

One of the philosopher-kings in our Republican legislature was explaining why he favors a bill to ban same-sex marriages.  It went something like this:  


"Water is composed of hydrogen and oxygen.  We call it 'water".  Now, if you were to put two hydrogen things together, that would not be water.  Or, you could put two of those oxygens together, but that would not be water, either.  Marriage is like water:  a man and a woman."


Lord knows it is difficult to argue with ironclad logic like that!  Oh, I suppose one could quibble and say that his analogy suggests that marriage should consist of two men and one woman, or (for those who want to live dangerously) two women and one man.  H2O.  Two atoms of hydrogen, and one of oxygen.  


But maybe he just meant that "water" is the only legitimate name for a molecule with two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.  Or, perhaps, he just meant that the term, "water" should only be used to describe two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom:  you know, not water-down the term.  


I find his argument convincing, of course:  a marriage is just like two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen.  Or, maybe, water is just like one man and one woman.  I know, as a fact, that two men together is not water, and I suspect that two women together is not water, either.  And two men and one woman together (and so on) is illegal.  It is also unstable, something like heavy water used in nuclear processes, in which the hydrogen atom has a neutron, and we all know that neutrons are not good for a marriage.  


We don't permit it here, but not all marriages are composed of just one hydrogen atom and one oxygen atom.  Muslims can have up to four oxygens.  Abraham and Jacob had a couple of hydrogens, each.  King David had lots and lots of oxygens, and a big bunch of hydrogens on the side, too.  Here, we allow just two atoms to get married.  Our law does not allow big molecules.  


Are we getting silly, here?  Yes, we are!  


Marriage is not just for procreation.  Some couples don't want children.  Some don't want sex, either.  They just want to be together, except when they are just hanging in there because they do not know how to get out.  


Why should we care if two men or two women want to live together, under the terms that law stipulates shall, and can, apply:  all kinds of things, from property ownership, inheritance, and being allowed to see each other in the hospital?  


As Dale says:  "If they allow same-sex marriage, does that mean I have to get a divorce?"


No, of course not!  It just mean he should not drink the heavy water.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friends-- My step-father of 35 years died this morning. His name was Conrad Royksund. He was 86 years old. He was born into poverty on a farm near Puyallup, WA. He was the first member of his family to attend college and earned a PhD from the University of Chicago. He paid his way through all of that by fishing in Alaska. He spent his professional career as a college professor. I met him when I was just 3 years old and don't actually have any memories of my life befor e he was in it. He was intimidatingly smart, funny as hell, and worked his ass off. He taught me to meet people with kindness and decency until I was certain they could not be trusted. He taught me to meet ideas with carving knives until I was certain they could. I will remember him as one of the bravest, most curious, and funniest people I have ever met. He left this world with a satisfied mind. We are so grateful. Dan Hubbard
1 comment
Read more

Nice to Run Into You Again

We do not see things in enormous time-frames.  We human beings are fairly new at figuring things out for ourselves.  For instance, some  people today still think of the earth as a newly created thing, perhaps ten thousand years old.  Earth is actually about four-and-a-half billion years old.   That is to say, the earth is 450,000 times older than the Adam and Eve story, and the universe is three times older than that! I recall first hearing that continents were slowly drifting around the earth, and that there quite likely had been several times when the continents were squeezed together.  But people could stand on the edge of their own continents, and not see Africa or Asia getting closer.  It took at least fifty years to figure things out. We called our continent something special. But sure enough, there have been numerous times during several-billion year history of the earth, when supercontinents formed, and eventually drifted off. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Sea is Rising

Let us just step back:  two hundred and fifty years ago, or so, the ships of England and Spain had drifted onto a whole new continent, as they saw it, from far north to a savagely cold south; pole to pole, as if there were such things. Millions of people already lived here, some of them still hunters and gatherers; some of them very wealthy, indeed!  Gold and silver stolen from the southern Americas funded Spanish and English dreams. There was land, lots of land, under starry skies above, rich land, and oil and coal and iron ore.  The whole western world learned how to build industries not on simple muscle power, but on steam and oil.  We farmed, too, of course.  All we needed was cheap labor--slave labor from Africa, mostly, so the ships came with slave labor.  Chinese labor built railroad beds where there had been rock cliffs. Europeans, long used to killing each other for good, religious reasons, brought their religious savagery with them. ...
Post a Comment
Read more